Posts Tagged ‘K1 Visa’

Waivers of Inadmissibility, I-601 Waivers, and Adjustment of Status

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010
Click Here

The K1 fiance visa was designed in order to institute means and method for alien fiancees of American citizens to travel to the USA in order to unite with their American counterparts. This travel document is usually called a “fiancee visa” because that is this visa’s raison d’etre. The primary advantage of the K-1 visa is that it has the quickest processing time when comparing it to marriage visas such as the K3 Visa and CR-1 visa. That being said, the K-1 does require that the alien fiance file for adjustment of status to lawful permanent residence within 90 days after being admitted to the United States. Usually, the adjustment of status process takes about 120 to 150 days from application submission until final decision.

The I-601 waiver was designed for those who are found to be inadmissible to the US due to one of the legal grounds of excludability found under the provisions of the United States Immigration and Nationality Act. In the Kingdom of Thailand, the two most common grounds of excludability are usually the result of a factual finding that the foreign fiance/fiancee engaged in acts amounting to prostitution within a 10 year period prior to the submission of a visa application or a finding that the foreign fiance/fiancee overstayed in the USA and thereby accrued unlawful presence on a prior visa.

Many ask: if an alien fiancee is approved for one of the aforementioned waivers of excludability, then will she ever need to be put through a readjudication of that issue? The short answer: no. Subsequent to an approval of an I-601 waiver application the underlying waiver is binding with regard to the facts at issue. Therefore, if the local Office of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) in Bangkok approves an I-601 waiver application, then that holding, based upon those unique and specific facts, will be respected by other USCIS offices adjudicating later applications that are connected to the alien’s presence in the United States of America.

By way of exampe of how this could play out: a Thai fiance/fiancee is issued a K-1 visa denial letter by the Consular Section at the American Embassy in Thailand based upon a factual finding that a legal grounds of excludability is present in the case. After notifying the Consulate that a waiver is to be sought, the file is then sent to the appropriate USCIS office. Should the I601 waiver petition receive approval, then the file will be remitted back to the appropriate US Consulate. The American Consulate should then issue the K-1 visa, and the applicant will travel to the United States, gain lawful admission, marry the American Citizen fiance, and submit an adjustment of status application.

In the above scenario, the previously adjudicated waiver should be recognized during the adjustment of status application process and as a result the matter would probably not be re-visited. A significant advantage of submitting an application for a waiver abroad is the fact that it can encourage transparency regarding upcoming phases of the process and may also be a benefit since waiver issues will be dealt with in a jurisdiction other than the one in which the US Citizen maintains his or her place of residence.


The K1 Visa in the year 2010

Friday, March 5th, 2010
Click Here

The K1 fiancee visa has been a popular travel document for those who have a foreign loved one whom they wish to bring back to the United States. In the year 2009, the K-1 visa process remained largely unmodified when comparing it to the process in the year 2008. That being said, there might be statutory modifications in store for the K1 fiance visa in 2010. This piece explores the possible modifications that couples could expect to encounter in the year 2010.

For those not familiar with the K1 visa process this is a short overview:

First, a K1 visa petition is filed by a US Citizen fiance at a USCIS Service Center in the United States. USCIS adjudicates the petitioner and, if approved, forwards it on to the National Visa Center. The National Visa Center conducts a security clearance and forwards the case on to the US Embassy or US Consulate overseas. Nearly all K-1 fiancee visa applications for those resident in Thailand are adjudicated at the American Embassy in the capital city of Bangkok. The Consular Officers at the United States Embassy will conduct a visa interview and, if the application is approved, issue the K1 visa.

For the most part, this process will likely remain unchanged for most couples in this new decade. However, a recently proposed rule from the United States Department of State would increase the United States Embassy processing fees. A current proposal would raise these fees from one hundred and thirty-one to three hundred and fifty dollars. By most estimates, a fee increase of $220 is significant. This might have an affect upon those who decide to file for a K-1 fiance visa as this three hundred and fifty dollar Consular Processing fee could turn out to be a prohibitive expenditure.

Another possible change in 2010: Comprehensive Immigration Reform. At present United States legislators and the President are discussing ways of overhauling the American Immigration system. Some have pondered if these changes to the American Immigration system will impact the visas categorized as “K” under the US Immigration and Nationality Act. In this author’s opinion, 2010 will not likely see major changes to the K1 fiancee visa process, but by being prepared for upcoming legislation petitioners, attorneys, and applicants will be able to foresee possible problems before they come up.

(Please note, the above article should not be viewed as a sufficient substitute for individualized legal advice from a competent licensed attorney. The above information is for general purposes only and should not be construed as advice regarding a specific set of factual circumstances. For those wishing to learn more information about American Immigration, it may be prudent to contact a licensed American Immigration lawyer.)


American Tourist Visas and Expedited Removal

Saturday, December 19th, 2009
Click Here

There appears to be a trend of expedited removal proceedings initiated against aliens attempting to enter the USA on tourist visas. The following post is a brief summary of the situation.

In recent years, this author, and other attorneys, have noticed a major spike in expedited removals at ports of entry in the USA. Increasingly, it looks as though non-immigrant aliens are being denied entry to the USA on the ground that they are undisclosed immigrants without documentation. This may not be the result of any general policy change on the part of Immigration officers at the Customs and Border Protection Service or at the Department of Homeland Security. This being said, the situation does provide this writer with an opportunity to discuss expedited removal and its effect upon US family Immigration cases.

In the cases recently scrutinized by this author, the foreign national was detained while attempting to enter the USA on a US Tourist visa. In cases such as this, the foreign national was the significant other of an American Citizen. After being questioned about their travel intentions some were subjected to body searches, baggage searches, as well as lengthy detainment while Immigration officers decided what ought to be done with the prospective entrant. In many cases in the past the prospective entrant was accorded an opportunity to voluntarily withdraw their application for entrance, board a plane, and go back to their home country (the home country was usually Thailand in this author’s experience). Currently, there are increasing numbers of cases where CBP officers find an intending entrant inadmissible and uses expedited removal proceedings to deny them access to the USA. This results in the foreign loved one being barred from reentering the USA for at least 5 years.

How is it possible for a Border Protection agent to ban a loved one when they attempted to enter the USA using a validly issued visa? Pursuant to Section 302 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), which became effective April 1st 1997, amending Section 235(b) of the INA, the Customs and Border Protection service was given the authority to impose expedited removal upon aliens attempting to enter the USA. In cases such as this, the most often noted reason for expedited removal of foreign loved ones trying to enter the US on tourist visas occurs in a case where the Customs and Border Protection official determines an alien with a tourist visa to be an “immigrant who is not in possession of a valid unexpired immigrant visa, reentry permit, border crossing identification card, or other valid entry document required by [The Immigration and Nationality Act], and a valid unexpired passport, or other suitable travel document, or document of identity and nationality if such document is required under the regulations.” [212(a)(7)(i)(1)]

Essentially, CBP seems to be using expedited removal when they believe an alien is secretly an intending immigrant using a tourist visa to quickly enter the United States and adjust status to permanent residence. This situation may be bypassed if an alien fiancee uses a K-1 visa to ask for admission to the USA. In instances regarding an alien spouse, an Immigrant visa or a K3 visa can be utilized to forestall expedited removal on the previously mentioned grounds.


Can Visa Application Approval Be Guaranteed For My Thai Fiancee?

Wednesday, December 9th, 2009
Click Here

In Thailand, as well as elsewhere around the world, there are many companies and so-called “lawyers,” “visa agents,” and “Immigration Consultants,” making all sorts of outrageous claims regarding what they can do to facilitate visa issuance for the Thai fiancĂ©es and spouses of American Citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents. One of the most incredible assertions is the idea that one of these agents can guarantee visa issuance. Throughout the World Wide Web there are consultants and visa companies making these claims and they dupe otherwise innocent consumers into believing that a visa can be guaranteed. One issue should be fully understood: No one can guarantee that a US visa will be granted. No qualified attorney will assert, with 100% certainty, that a visa will be issued. USCIS officers make determinations based upon the unique facts of each United States visa application. The Consular officers at the United States Embassies and Consulates abroad make further factual findings to determine if US visa issuance is warranted based upon the facts before them. A licensed US lawyer should act as an advocate for visa application approval. Also, an American Immigration attorney can provide advice and assistance to clients regarding the type of visa that they should apply for. A competent Immigration attorney will do everything ethical to be certain that a visa is issued.

If one looks at the fine print of most of these so-called “guarantees” one will see that many of these guarantors only guarantee “USCIS approval” which is only one component of the US visa process and not the same thing as visa issuance.

Where an attorney enters their appearance, they are also required to represent their client for the duration of the case, or to the point agreed to by the client. Another unfortunate occurrence in Thailand and elsewhere abroad is to see “visa agents” and “lawyers” abandon their clients and their clients’ Thai fiancees and wives when the case becomes more complicated than originally anticipated.

There are many unlicensed “visa companies” operating outside of the United States of America. According to USCIS regulations no one is allowed to take money in exchange for providing advice regarding United States Immigration law unless they are a licensed attorney in one of the 50 US States or a territory of the United States. Therefore, unless one is dealing with a licensed United States attorney, one should not be paying for the services of a so-called “visa agent,” or “lawyer,” who cannot produce credentials. If dealing with one claiming to be a lawyer ask to see their US state or Federal license to practice law. If they cannot produce such documentation then there is a strong reason to believe that they are not entitled by law to represent clients before the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS).

To learn more, please see my Thai fiance.


US Visa: The Widow’s Penalty

Monday, December 7th, 2009
Click Here

The following article explains the so-called “Widow’s Penalty.” Inconsistencies in the United States Immigration and Nationality Act have the effect of placing widows and widowers of United States Citizens in untenable positions should the American spouse pass away before some crucial phase of the Immigration process.

United States Immigration is a deep area of law as it is highly statute driven. There are some facets of US Immigration law that are byzantine, to say the least, one issue that can become very complicated and uncomfortable concerns the loss of immigration benefits upon the death of a US Citizen spouse.

Where a foreign national marries a US Citizen, if the foreign spouse wishes to obtain unconditional US Permanent Residence, then they must run a “gauntlet” of various adjudicatory proceedings to determine the bona fides of the marriage. From a certain perspective one could argue that scrutiny begins when the American Citizen files the K1 visa application. After initial approval, the application will be forwarded to the US Embassy (or it’s Consulate Counterpart) with jurisdiction over the foreign fiance’s place of residence. The Consulate will conduct an interview and upon application approval, they will issue a K1 fiance visa. The Thai (or any nationality, for that matter) fiancee must then pass inspection at a port of entry in the USA where officers will make another adjudication regarding admissibility.

After lawful admission in the United States, the non-Citizen fiancee must marry the Citizen fiance and apply for adjustment of status wthin 90 days. In most cases, the marriage is executed and the foreign spouse is approved for adjustment, thereby making her a conditional lawful permanent resident. After two years in conditional permanent resident status, the foreign spouse, along with her American husband, will need to file to have the conditionality of residence lifted and thereby make her an unconditional lawful permanent resident. The so-called “widows penalty” becomes an issue during the pendency of an adjustment of status application or before the submission of an application to lift the conditions of the foreign spouse’s residence. If the American Citizen spouse dies prior to the approval of either of these petitions, then it can create a difficult situation for the foreign spouse because the applicant no longer meets the requirement for a lifting of conditions or adjustment. Thus, the non-Citizen widow could be considered out of status as they are no longer married to a United States Citizen. US Courts have attempted to address this problem by interpreting statutes to allow foreign spouses to remain in the United States. The United States Department of Homeland Security has provided a sort of amnesty for widows by deferring inspection of those in that situation.

This issue has not been fully dealt with as there are many conflicting interpretations of the current law. The current members of the US judiciary seem to be in favor of eliminating this inequitable provision of US Immigration law as it leads to unfair outcomes for widows and widowers of American Citizens and Permanent Residents.


After Issuance: What Do the Dates on the K1 Visa Mean?

Sunday, December 6th, 2009
Click Here

This article is designed to inform readers about the issues surrounding issuance of a K1 visa for a Thai fiancee. All over the world wide web there are websites which claim expertise in US Visas from Thailand. The intention of this piece is to simply provide information and insight.

The process of obtaining the K1 is time consuming and can cause frustration. In many cases, a couple will wait five or six months before being granted preliminary approval from the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service. In Thai K1 visa cases, after approval, the application is sent from the National Visa Center to the US Embassy Bangkok. For many, this process can be aggravating. In a large number of instances, the wait eventually ends and the visa application is approved.

Once the visa is issued, some American Citizen fiances become concerned about the information and dates noted on the visa itself. A major source of anxiety for some is the note on the visa which says, “K1 Petition Expires Month Day, Year.” Many American Citizens mistakenly believe that this is the end of the visa’s validity. As a practical matter, the visa is valid for going to the USA until its expiration. Generally, K1 visas are issued with a six month validity period. These documents could be distributed with a different validity period because that decision is left to the Consular Officer.

The date of the visa’s expiry can be confusing for some. The K1 visa is valid for six months after issuance. That being said, upon arriving in the United States and being admitted at the port of entry the K1 visa holder is only entitled to 90 days presence in the United States (it should be noted that if the visa holder does, in fact, marry the American and apply for adjustment of status, then she would be entitled to remain indefinitely provided the adjustment of status is approved and any conditions are lifted). Many people, after receiving the K1 visa, are confused by these differing dates. The important thing to bear in mind about the K1 visa is that it can be utilized within 6 months of its issuance and it provides 90 days of lawful status to the bearer upon entry. If the parties do not get married in 90 days, then the K1 visa holder must leave the USA before the visa expires.


American Visa Law: Form G-28

Friday, December 4th, 2009
Click Here

As of the day of this writing, USCIS is issuing a new G28 (Notice of Attorney Appearance) form. This document is used to signal the presence of an attorney in a case pending before the DHS (Department of Homeland Security).

United States Citizens meet, date, and form relationships with those from nations outside the USA. Therefore, a significant number of American Immigration applications are presented to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). In many cases, the petitioner and beneficiary opt to deal with their immigration matter without counsel, in these situations a G-28 is not necessary. A G-28 is a method of informing the United States government that an accredited representative is entering an appearance in the case, it is generally presented by a United States attorney.

A major difference between the new version of the G28 and the old version is that the new form requires the attorney to signal the US agency involved in the matter. If the situation involves an issue with the CBP (Customs and Border Protection), then the lawyer will tick the box on the G-28 denoting said agency. If the attorney is representing a client who has had been apprehended by the agency known as Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), then he or she will be required to indicate that the G28 is submitted in connection with a pending matter before ICE.

In situations where a G-28 is submitted, it is common for USCIS to send the attorney of record duplicate copies of all correspondence between the Service and the Petitioner. Further, should the US Embassy correspond with the Beneficiary, in some cases, the US attorney will be copied in on the correspondence.

A G-28 is a way of ascertaining whether one is dealing with a licensed lawyer as only a licensed lawyer is entitled to take payment in compensation for representing a client before US Immigration agencies. Further, the current G28 form requires the attorney to disclose their state of license and bar number. One should not feel embarrassed to ask for a copy of an attorney’s credentials. Any United States Immigration practitioner who is unable to produce some sort of license (state bar license, state Supreme Court license, Federal Court license, etc.) should be viewed with caution.

To learn more please see: k1 visa. Please see k1 visa process for more on getting a visa to the USA.